Industry Signal

Two-Thirds of Image Buyers Say Human-Made Beats AI-Generated

October 25, 2026 · 4 min read
Two-Thirds of Image Buyers Say Human-Made Beats AI-Generated
In short: In a July 2026 Storyblocks survey of 1,442 professionals, two-thirds said human-made assets are higher quality than AI-generated ones — yet 87 percent had used AI-generated content in the past year. Half had rejected AI-generated stock outright. Buyers are drawing a line between AI that helps make the work and AI that replaces the work.

What did the survey actually find?

Storyblocks surveyed 1,442 professionals who license stock media in July 2026. Two-thirds agreed that human-made assets are higher quality than AI-generated ones, and half reported avoiding or rejecting AI-generated stock in the past year. Yet 87 percent of the same respondents had used AI-generated visual or audio content in the past year. They are not avoiding AI. They are choosing where it belongs.

Those numbers sit next to a business decision. Storyblocks has grown its library 66 percent in the past year to more than 10 million files, without accepting any AI-generated content.

Why are buyers drawing this line?

The answer Storyblocks gives is perspective. Chief executive TJ Leonard puts it plainly: content made by a person carries a perspective. As AI-generated content becomes the majority of what people consume, the difference between authentic content that carries a real perspective and content that merely mimics perspective will become more visible, not less.

Storyblocks accepts fewer than 5 percent of contributor applications, and every asset is reviewed. That curation, plus direct agreements with every artist, gives buyers licensing clarity and indemnification that AI-generated content does not carry.

Is AI being rejected entirely?

No, and that is what makes the result useful rather than just comforting. Storyblocks itself uses AI heavily: conversational search and an AI toolkit that generates and customizes images from text prompts. The company draws the line at the library itself, which stays 100 percent human-made.

The split is the lesson. AI is welcome as a tool that removes friction from the process. It is not welcome as a substitute for the picture. Buyers use AI to find and adapt work, and still want a person behind the frame.

Why it matters for you

If you are learning the craft, this is the clearest market signal you will get this year. The skill that is gaining value is not prompting. It is making real photographs of real things, with a point of view a buyer can feel and a provenance a client can trust. That is what the Arena rewards every night.

So keep the story with the shot: where you were, what you were trying to say, and why you chose that frame. When a client asks what makes your work worth paying for, the answer is not your camera. It is that a person stood somewhere, saw something, and made a decision. That is becoming the premium, and it is the one thing a generator cannot claim.

← All field notes